Olivet Discourse = Premillennialist's Difficulty
The following brief interpretation of Matthew 24:1-35 advocates the AD70 destruction of Jerusalem (by the Roman army) as the fulfillment of these verses. I am persuaded this is a better interpretation than the typical American evangelical dispensational premillennial understanding of these verses. I am also persuaded that these verses contain insurmountable difficulties for the overall premillennial position.
Here is Part I of the article.
Here is Part II of the article.
What do you think?
Anybody know the piece of art here to the right?